Hi Aaron, thanks for your questions. I'll try to answer them. It's very tough to put the strategy into words. The best I can do is some thing like this: Imagine for a moment you are the victimised player. If you cooperate, the victimiser will cooperate back to a restricted extent so cheap mulberry outlet you get a little advantage from it. But if you betray him, he will savagely and frequently betray you. The extent to which canada goose sale he does these two issues are cautiously gauged so that there's no benefit to you from betraying him: you may as well just cooperate, even though you get small out of it. An additional way to think about this (which might wind up even more perplexing!) is that looked at over its many iterations, the game is actually an Ultimatum Game: the victimiser tends to make an unfair provide, and other participant has to determine whether or not to take it if he rejects it, cheap air max 1 both get absolutely nothing. If two gamers adopt this technique, my understanding is that the end result is dependent on which of them started it initial. The 1 who initial took up the strategy will do better, because from the other's point of see, the best reaction (the one that nets them the least jailtime) is to cooperate all the time. I've been looking at the paper some much more. They give a particular instance of the technique. Say that the medium jail sentence is four many years, the long one is 5 years, and if each prisoners keep peaceful they each get 2 many canada goose outlet years. Then the strategy is that in the current game I cooperate with a probability p which depends on what happened in the last round: I cooperated, you cooperated, p = 11/thirteen I cooperated, you defected, p = 1/2 I defected, you cooperated, p = 7/26 We each defected, p = If I undertake this strategy, your best protection is to usually cooperate and you will get on average about 3.one many years, whereas I'll get on typical about 1.3 many years. If you also undertake the strategy, you will do even worse we will get into a rut of continuously defecting, so we will both get a four year sentence on each spherical. This is a honest stage, but I think I would argue that while the conditions may not be identical every time, we do encounter moncler sale numerous repeated encounters. You only go on Who Desires to be a Millionaire once, if at all, but you go to the grocery store at least as soon as a 7 days (I'm guessing), and have dealings with coworkers and near family members all the time. Likewise, the international climate negotiations have experienced 1 big gettogether each year for the final twenty years, and display no sign of stopping any time quickly. So whether or not or not this specific strategy is